Updated 2026-03-08
The Funded Trader vs PipFarm: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between The Funded Trader and PipFarm face a decision between an established firm with flexible rules versus a newer player with higher profit splits. The Funded Trader removes daily loss limits and time constraints entirely, while PipFarm offers a 99% payout split but imposes stricter trading parameters. The Funded Trader costs $489 for a $100K challenge compared to PipFarm's $750, yet each firm targets different trading styles. This comparison examines pricing, rules, platforms, and reputation to determine which prop firm aligns with your trading approach.
Which Should You Choose?
The Funded Trader suits aggressive traders and scalpers who need maximum flexibility, offering no daily loss limits, no time constraints, and multiple platform options including MATCH-TRADER and DXTrade. At $489 for the $100K challenge versus PipFarm's $750, it provides better value for traders who prioritize rule flexibility over payout percentages. The firm's allowance of news trading and EA/bots makes it ideal for algorithmic traders and those who trade major announcements.
PipFarm appeals to consistent, conservative traders who can work within a 2% daily loss limit and value higher profit splits, offering 99% payouts compared to The Funded Trader's undisclosed rates. However, the 90-day time limit and $750 entry cost create additional pressure. The firm's 4.3/5 Trustpilot rating from 1,000 reviews suggests strong service, though the sample size is smaller than The Funded Trader's 22,000 reviews.
For most traders, The Funded Trader provides better overall value through lower costs, unlimited risk parameters, and platform variety, making it the stronger choice despite PipFarm's higher payout split and superior ratings.
Most traders choose The Funded Trader based on this comparison
Affiliate disclosure: links above may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more