Which firm has better evaluation rules?

Atmos Funded offers more flexible evaluation rules with no daily loss limits, no minimum trading days, and a single-phase evaluation process. Quant Tekel requires a two-phase evaluation with 4% daily loss limits and 4 minimum trading days, but provides clear structure with 8% Phase 1 profit targets.

What are the main differences in trading restrictions?

Quant Tekel restricts news trading and offers multiple platform options including MT5, cTrader, and TradeLocker. Atmos Funded's trading restrictions and platform availability are not specified, making it difficult to assess their trading environment.

Are both firms trustworthy and legitimate?

Quant Tekel shows strong legitimacy indicators with 12,000+ Trustpilot reviews (4.4/5) and transparent operations based in Cape Town. Atmos Funded has fewer reviews (300) with a 4.2/5 rating, and lacks publicly available information about key trading terms and company location.

Which firm should I choose as a new prop trader?

New traders should choose Quant Tekel for its proven track record, clear evaluation structure, and comprehensive platform support. The firm's transparency in pricing ($340 for $100K challenge) and payout terms (80-90% split) provides predictability that beginners need.

ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more

Updated 2026-03-08

Quant Tekel vs Atmos Funded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?

Traders choosing between Quant Tekel and Atmos Funded face a decision between a well-established firm with comprehensive trading infrastructure versus a newer entrant with more flexible evaluation rules. Quant Tekel offers multiple trading platforms, bi-weekly payouts, and proven track record with 12,000+ reviews, while Atmos Funded eliminates daily loss limits and minimum trading days entirely. This comparison examines their evaluation structures, trading conditions, and reliability to help determine which firm better serves different trading styles. Both firms launched in 2023 but have taken distinctly different approaches to prop trading.

Quant Tekel

Est. 2023 · Cape Town, South Africa

4.4

12,000 reviews

4 wins

6 ties

3 wins

Atmos Funded

Est. 2023 · N/A

4.2

300 reviews

Feature

Quant Tekel

Atmos Funded

Challenge Price ($100K)

$340

N/A

Phase 1 Profit Target

N/A

Phase 2 Profit Target

None (single-phase)✓ Single-phase evaluation

Max Daily Loss

No limit✓ No daily loss limit

Max Total Loss

10%

N/A

Min Trading Days

4 days

None✓ No minimum

Time Limit (Phase 1)

No limit

Payout Split

80% (up to 90%)

N/A

Quant Tekel

Pros

+Competitively priced QT Prime challenge from $30 for a $5K account

+Multiple evaluation types — 2-step, instant, and aggressive options to suit different traders

+80% profit split from day one, up to 90% as you scale

+Bi-weekly payouts on QT Prime funded accounts

+Multiple platform options including MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and FIX API

Cons

−News trading restricted on funded accounts — 5-minute buffer required on QT Prime, banned on QT Power and QT Ultra

−Copy trading and multi-account strategies not allowed

−Consistency rules apply across all account types with varying thresholds

−Restricted countries include Russia, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, and Cyprus

Atmos Funded

Our Verdict

Which Should You Choose?

Quant Tekel is the clear choice for serious traders who prioritize reliability, platform variety, and consistent payouts. With 12,000+ Trustpilot reviews (4.4/5), bi-weekly payout schedules, and support for MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and FIX API, it offers the infrastructure needed for professional trading operations. The 4% daily loss limit and 4-day minimum trading requirement are reasonable constraints for disciplined traders.

Atmos Funded appears better suited for traders who need maximum flexibility in their trading approach, particularly those who struggle with daily loss limits or prefer sporadic trading schedules. However, the lack of available data on challenge pricing, profit targets, payout splits, and platform options raises significant concerns about the firm's operational readiness.

For most traders, Quant Tekel is the safer choice. Its proven track record, transparent pricing structure, and comprehensive platform support outweigh Atmos Funded's flexibility advantages, especially given the incomplete information available about Atmos Funded's core offerings.

Choose Quant Tekel if:

→Competitively priced QT Prime challenge from $30 for a $5K account

→Multiple evaluation types — 2-step, instant, and aggressive options to suit different traders

→80% profit split from day one, up to 90% as you scale

→Bi-weekly payouts on QT Prime funded accounts

Choose Atmos Funded if:

Frequently Asked Questions

Quant Tekel vs Atmos Funded FAQ

Related Comparisons

/Compare/Fundednext vs Quant Tekel →/Compare/Ftmo vs Quant Tekel →/Compare/Fundingpips vs Quant Tekel →/Compare/Fundednext vs Atmos Funded →/Compare/Ftmo vs Atmos Funded →/Compare/Fundingpips vs Atmos Funded →

Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.