TPThe Trading Playbook
ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more

Updated 2026-03-08

FTMO vs Atmos Funded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?

The choice between FTMO and Atmos Funded comes down to whether you prioritize proven reliability or maximum trading flexibility. FTMO offers a structured two-phase evaluation with established payout systems, while Atmos Funded eliminates most restrictions with their single-phase model and no daily loss limits. This comparison examines their evaluation processes, trading rules, payout structures, and overall reliability to help you decide which firm better matches your trading style and experience level.

F
FTMO
Est. 2015 · Prague, Czech Republic
4.8
40,000 reviews
VS
6 wins
4 ties
4 wins
AF
Atmos Funded
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.2
300 reviews
Feature
FTMO
Atmos Funded
Challenge Price ($100K)
$540
N/A
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
N/A
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%
None (single-phase)Single-phase evaluation
Max Daily Loss
5%
No limitNo daily loss limit
Max Total Loss
10%
N/A
Min Trading Days
4 days
NoneNo minimum
Time Limit (Phase 1)
30 days
No limitNo time limit
Payout Split
80% (up to 90%)
N/A
FTMO
Pros
+Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
+Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
+Multiple platform options (MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade)
+Strong payout track record — $500M+ total paid to traders
+Performance coaching and FTMO Academy included
Cons
News trading restricted (2 min buffer around major events)
Higher challenge prices than most competitors at same account sizes
Scaling plan slower than rivals (25% increase every 4 months)
Maximum initial allocation capped at $200K before scaling
Atmos Funded
Our Verdict

Which Should You Choose?

FTMO is the clear choice for traders who value proven reliability, structured progression, and regular payouts. With 9 years in operation, 40,000 Trustpilot reviews averaging 4.8/5, and bi-weekly payout schedules, FTMO offers the stability that serious traders need. The two-phase evaluation system, while more restrictive, provides a clear path to funded accounts with well-established rules.

Atmos Funded appeals to experienced traders who feel constrained by traditional prop firm rules and can handle unlimited flexibility responsibly. The single-phase evaluation with no daily loss limits, minimum trading days, or time restrictions removes the common frustrations that cause traders to fail challenges. However, with only 300 reviews and being founded in 2023, the track record remains unproven.

For most traders, especially those new to prop trading, FTMO's established infrastructure and proven payout history outweigh the appeal of Atmos Funded's flexible rules. Choose FTMO unless you specifically need the unrestricted trading environment that Atmos Funded provides.

Choose FTMO if:
Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
Multiple platform options (MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade)
Strong payout track record — $500M+ total paid to traders
Choose Atmos Funded if:
Frequently Asked Questions

FTMO vs Atmos Funded FAQ

Related Comparisons
/Compare/Fundednext vs Ftmo/Compare/Ftmo vs Fundingpips/Compare/Ftmo vs The Funded Trader/Compare/Fundednext vs Atmos Funded/Compare/Fundingpips vs Atmos Funded/Compare/The Funded Trader vs Atmos Funded
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.