Which firm has better daily loss rules?

Blueberry Funded has no daily loss limits while FundingPips enforces a 5% daily loss limit. This makes Blueberry better for volatile strategies or news trading where daily drawdowns can exceed 5%. However, FundingPips' limit provides more structure for risk management.

How do their evaluation phases compare?

FundingPips uses a traditional two-phase system with 8% Phase 1 target and 5% Phase 2 target. Blueberry Funded uses a single-phase evaluation with no Phase 2 requirements. This makes Blueberry faster to reach funded status but provides less gradual skill development.

Which prop firm is more trustworthy?

FundingPips has significantly more market credibility with 48,000 Trustpilot reviews at 4.5/5 versus Blueberry's 500 reviews at 4.3/5. FundingPips has also operated since 2022 compared to Blueberry's 2023 founding. The review volume difference suggests much larger trader adoption for FundingPips.

Should beginners choose FundingPips or Blueberry Funded?

Beginners should choose FundingPips due to their proven track record, established payout systems, and multiple platform options. The two-phase evaluation also provides better learning progression than Blueberry's single-phase system. New traders benefit more from structure than from Blueberry's unlimited flexibility.

This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more

Updated 2026-03-08

FundingPips vs Blueberry Funded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?

Traders choosing between FundingPips and Blueberry Funded face a decision between a structured two-phase program and a streamlined single-phase approach. FundingPips, established in 2022, offers traditional prop firm structure with weekly payouts and multiple platform options, while Blueberry Funded eliminates daily loss limits and minimum trading days entirely. The choice hinges on whether you prioritize operational flexibility or evaluation simplicity. This comparison examines their rules, payout structures, and practical differences to help you determine which firm aligns with your trading strategy.

FundingPips

Est. 2022 · Dubai, UAE

4.5

46K+ reviews

2 wins

4 ties

4 wins

Blueberry Funded

Est. 2023 · Australia

4.3

500 reviews

Feature

FundingPips

Blueberry Funded

Phase 1 Profit Target

N/A

Phase 2 Profit Target

None (single-phase)✓ Single-phase evaluation

Max Daily Loss

No limit✓ No daily loss limit

Max Total Loss

10%

N/A

Min Trading Days

3 days

None✓ No minimum

Time Limit (Phase 1)

No limit

Payout Split

60% (up to 100%)

N/A

Payout Frequency

weekly, bi-weekly, monthly or on demand✓ Faster payouts

N/A

FundingPips

Pros

+Zero reward denials policy for peace of mind trading

+Flexible payout cycles from weekly to on-demand with up to 100% profit share

+Multiple platform options including MT5, Match-Trader and cTrader

+Claims over $200M earned by traders globally with strong payout track record

+Instant funding option available alongside traditional evaluation process

Cons

−Limited information available about detailed trading rules and restrictions

−Newer firm established in 2022 with less track record than older competitors

−Maximum simulated capital capped at $300K which is lower than some rivals

Blueberry Funded

Pros

+No time limit on trading evaluations

+Broker-backed firm providing industry leading platforms

+Simulated capital up to $2,000,000 available

+Instant funding option available to skip evaluation

+Scaling plan allows 25% balance increase every 3 months with up to 90% profit split

Cons

−Newer firm established in 2023 with limited track record

−Specific trading rules and restrictions not clearly detailed on main pages

−Account pricing and challenge costs not disclosed on homepage

Our Verdict

Which Should You Choose?

Blueberry Funded suits aggressive traders and scalpers who need maximum operational freedom. With no daily loss limits, no minimum trading days, and a single-phase evaluation, it removes the typical prop firm constraints that can interfere with high-frequency strategies or volatile market conditions.

FundingPips better serves systematic traders who want established processes and reliable payouts. Their weekly to on-demand payout schedule, multiple platform options (MT5, Match-Trader, cTrader), and 4.5/5 Trustpilot rating from 48,000 reviews demonstrate operational maturity that newer traders often need.

For most traders, FundingPips is the safer choice. Their track record with nearly 50,000 reviews versus Blueberry's 500 reviews, combined with flexible payout options and proven platform stability, outweighs Blueberry's rule advantages. Choose Blueberry only if daily loss limits consistently interfere with your trading style.

Choose FundingPips if:

→Zero reward denials policy for peace of mind trading

→Flexible payout cycles from weekly to on-demand with up to 100% profit share

→Multiple platform options including MT5, Match-Trader and cTrader

→Claims over $200M earned by traders globally with strong payout track record

Choose Blueberry Funded if:

→No time limit on trading evaluations

→Broker-backed firm providing industry leading platforms

→Simulated capital up to $2,000,000 available

→Instant funding option available to skip evaluation

Blueberry Funded — Start Your Challenge →Or try FundingPips instead

Most traders choose Blueberry Funded based on this comparison

Affiliate disclosure: links above may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more

Frequently Asked Questions

FundingPips vs Blueberry Funded FAQ

Related Comparisons

Fundednext vs Fundingpips →Ftmo vs Fundingpips →Fundingpips vs The Funded Trader →Fundednext vs Blueberry Funded →Ftmo vs Blueberry Funded →The Funded Trader vs Blueberry Funded →

Try FundingPips →Try Blueberry Funded →

Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.