ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
FTMO vs OneFunded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between FTMO and OneFunded face a fundamental decision between a proven, established firm with strict rules versus a new entrant offering maximum flexibility. FTMO's two-phase evaluation with daily loss limits and time constraints contrasts sharply with OneFunded's single-phase approach with no daily limits or time restrictions. This comparison examines the key differences in evaluation structure, trading rules, and which firm better serves different trading styles and experience levels.
F
FTMO
Est. 2015 · Prague, Czech Republic
4.8
40,000 reviews
VS
4 wins
6 ties
4 wins
O
OneFunded
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.2
1,000 reviews
Feature
FTMO
OneFunded
Challenge Price ($100K)
$540
N/A
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
N/A
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%
None (single-phase)✓ Single-phase evaluation
Max Daily Loss
5%
No limit✓ No daily loss limit
Max Total Loss
10%
N/A
Min Trading Days
4 days
None✓ No minimum
Time Limit (Phase 1)
30 days
No limit✓ No time limit
Payout Split
80% (up to 90%)
N/A
FTMO
Pros
+Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
+Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
+Strong payout track record — $500M+ total paid to traders
+Performance coaching and FTMO Academy included
Cons
−News trading restricted (2 min buffer around major events)
−Higher challenge prices than most competitors at same account sizes
−Scaling plan slower than rivals (25% increase every 4 months)
−Maximum initial allocation capped at $200K before scaling
OneFunded
Pros
+No time deadlines for challenges - focus on performance over time constraints
+Up to 90% profit share for traders
+Multi-platform support including MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade
+Virtual capital trading with no personal investment required
+14-day payout cycle with transparent tracking dashboard
Cons
−Relatively new firm established in 2023 with limited track record
−MT5 not available for clients in USA and Turkey
−cTrader not available for clients in USA
−Limited specific rule details provided on main website
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
OneFunded suits aggressive traders and scalpers who need freedom from daily loss limits and time pressure, while FTMO serves traders who prefer structure and proven track records. OneFunded's single-phase evaluation with no daily loss limits makes it ideal for high-frequency traders and those who struggle with FTMO's 5% daily loss rule, but the firm's 2023 founding date means limited operational history.
FTMO wins for most traders due to its 8-year track record, 4.8/5 Trustpilot rating from 40,000 reviews, and comprehensive platform support including MT4. The two-phase structure, while more restrictive, has successfully funded thousands of traders and offers scaling opportunities that OneFunded hasn't proven yet.
Bottom line: Choose OneFunded if you're an experienced scalper or swing trader who consistently hits daily loss limits elsewhere. Choose FTMO for reliability, proven payouts, and if you can work within structured evaluation parameters.
Choose FTMO if:
→Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
→Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.