This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
FundedNext vs FTMO: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Choosing between FundedNext and FTMO comes down to whether you prioritize easier challenge requirements or proven industry reputation. FundedNext offers a lower 8% Phase 1 profit target and no time limits, making it more accessible for newer traders, while FTMO's established track record since 2015 and slightly higher Trustpilot rating appeal to traders seeking stability. This comparison examines challenge costs, profit targets, trading rules, and payout structures to help you determine which firm better matches your trading style and experience level.
F
FundedNext
Est. 2022 · Dhaka, Bangladesh
4.5
61,000 reviews
VS
5 wins
4 ties
5 wins
F
FTMO
Est. 2015 · Prague, Czech Republic
4.8
40,000 reviews
Feature
FundedNext
FTMO
Challenge Price ($100K)
$549.99
$540✓ Lower entry cost
Phase 1 Profit Target
8%✓ Easier to pass
10%
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%
5%
Max Daily Loss
5%
5%
Max Total Loss
10%
10%
Min Trading Days
5 days
4 days✓ More flexible
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit✓ No time limit
30 days
Payout Split
80% (up to 95%)✓ Higher profit split
80% (up to 90%)
FundedNext
Pros
+No time limit in challenge phases allowing flexible trading approach
+Up to 95% profit split with performance rewards guaranteed in 24 hours
+15% profit share available from challenge phase itself
+Multiple platform options including MT4, MT5, cTrader and futures platforms
+News trading allowed with weekend holding permitted
Cons
−Relatively new firm established in 2022 with less track record
−Daily loss limits still apply despite no time restrictions
−Minimum trading day requirements must still be met
−Challenge fee required upfront before any trading can begin
FTMO
Pros
+Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
+Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
+Strong payout track record — $500M+ total paid to traders
+Performance coaching and FTMO Academy included
Cons
−News trading restricted (2 min buffer around major events)
−Higher challenge prices than most competitors at same account sizes
−Scaling plan slower than rivals (25% increase every 4 months)
−Maximum initial allocation capped at $200K before scaling
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
FundedNext suits aggressive traders and scalpers who benefit from the 8% Phase 1 target, unlimited time limits, and unrestricted news trading. The firm's higher maximum profit split (95% vs 90%) also makes it attractive for consistent performers who can scale up over time. However, its relative newness since 2022 means less proven stability.
FTMO better serves conservative traders who prefer the credibility of an 8-year track record and don't mind the stricter 10% Phase 1 target. The $9.99 lower challenge cost and 4-day minimum trading requirement offer slight practical advantages, though news trading restrictions limit scalping strategies.
For most traders, FundedNext edges out FTMO due to its significantly easier challenge requirements and better long-term profit potential. Unless you specifically need FTMO's established reputation or can't trade without news events, FundedNext's 20% lower profit target and unlimited time frame make funding more achievable.
Choose FundedNext if:
→No time limit in challenge phases allowing flexible trading approach
→Up to 95% profit split with performance rewards guaranteed in 24 hours
→15% profit share available from challenge phase itself
→Multiple platform options including MT4, MT5, cTrader and futures platforms
Choose FTMO if:
→Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
→Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.