ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
E8 Markets vs PipFarm: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between E8 Markets and PipFarm face a decision between established affordability and newer flexibility. E8 Markets offers a $100K challenge for just $234 compared to PipFarm's $750, while PipFarm counters with no daily loss limits and higher maximum drawdown. This comparison examines their challenge costs, risk parameters, trading rules, and payout structures to determine which firm aligns with different trading styles and capital constraints.
EM
E8 Markets
Est. 2021 · Prague, Czech Republic
4.5
3,200 reviews
VS
6 wins
4 ties
3 wins
P
PipFarm
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.3
1,000 reviews
Feature
E8 Markets
PipFarm
Challenge Price ($100K)
$234✓ Lower entry cost
$750
Phase 1 Profit Target
6%
N/A
Max Daily Loss
No limit✓ No daily loss limit
2%
Max Total Loss
4%
6%✓ More drawdown room
Min Trading Days
1 days
None✓ No minimum
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit✓ No time limit
90 days
Payout Split
80% (up to 100%)✓ Higher profit split
99%
Payout Frequency
N/A
7 days
E8 Markets
Pros
+Single-phase challenge — no Phase 2, pass with just 6% profit target
+Pass in as little as 1 day with no minimum trading day requirement
+Up to 100% profit split available on E8 ONE accounts
+Copy trading across your own accounts is fully permitted
+E8 ONE offers selectable drawdown (4–14%) and payout (80–100%) to match your style
Cons
−No separate daily loss limit — relies solely on EOD total drawdown (4% on Signature)
−Payouts are discretionary and subject to E8's acceptance of performance data
−Cross-account hedging and signal services are prohibited
−E8 ONE funded accounts have a 5-minute news restriction around high-impact events
−60-day inactivity rule — account closed if no trade placed within 60 days
PipFarm
Pros
+Highest profit share in the industry at up to 99%
+Multiple challenge modes (Classic, Endurance, Consistency) to suit different trading styles
+Fast scaling program up to $1.5M maximum allocation
+Flexible payout intervals with weekly option available
+Experience points system with increasing benefits and profit share up to 99%
Cons
−Relatively new firm founded in 2023 with limited track record
−Limited to cTrader platform only
−Complex rule structure with multiple modes may be confusing for beginners
−90-day time limit resets after each payout adding pressure
−Many features require additional fees as add-ons
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
E8 Markets suits cost-conscious traders and those who prefer no time pressure, offering the most affordable $100K challenge at $234 and unlimited time to complete phases. The firm's allowance of news trading and EAs makes it ideal for algorithmic traders and those who trade major announcements. However, the 4% maximum drawdown requires tighter risk management.
PipFarm better serves aggressive traders who need more breathing room, providing 6% maximum drawdown and no minimum trading days requirement. The firm's 99% payout split appeals to profitable traders, though the $750 entry cost and 90-day time limit create additional pressure. For beginners on a budget, E8 Markets wins decisively due to its 3x lower entry cost and no time constraints.
Choose E8 Markets if:
→Single-phase challenge — no Phase 2, pass with just 6% profit target
→Pass in as little as 1 day with no minimum trading day requirement
→Up to 100% profit split available on E8 ONE accounts
→Copy trading across your own accounts is fully permitted
Choose PipFarm if:
→Highest profit share in the industry at up to 99%
→Multiple challenge modes (Classic, Endurance, Consistency) to suit different trading styles
→Fast scaling program up to $1.5M maximum allocation
→Flexible payout intervals with weekly option available
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.