Updated 2026-03-08
Blueberry Funded vs Moneta Funded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between Blueberry Funded and Moneta Funded face a decision between an established Australian firm with proven scaling capabilities versus a newer entrant to the prop trading space. The most significant difference lies in account growth potential — Blueberry Funded offers scaling up to $2,000,000 while Moneta Funded's scaling options remain unclear. Both firms share similar approaches to time limits and platform offerings, but their track records and maximum funding potential set them apart. This comparison examines the key factors that should drive your decision between these two prop firms.
Which Should You Choose?
Blueberry Funded is the clear choice for traders focused on long-term account growth and scaling potential. With a maximum scaled account size of $2,000,000 and a more established track record since 2023, it offers serious traders the infrastructure to build substantial funded accounts over time. The firm's 4.3/5 Trustpilot rating from 500 reviews also demonstrates more extensive user feedback and slightly higher satisfaction levels.
Moneta Funded, as a 2024 startup, may appeal to traders who prefer working with newer firms that might offer more personalized attention or innovative approaches. However, without clear scaling options or maximum account information, it presents significant limitations for ambitious traders. The firm's 4/5 rating from 200 reviews shows decent user satisfaction but less market validation.
For most serious traders, Blueberry Funded represents the better choice due to its proven scaling system and clearer growth trajectory. Only consider Moneta Funded if you specifically prefer newer firms and don't prioritize long-term account scaling.
Most traders choose Blueberry Funded based on this comparison
Affiliate disclosure: links above may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more