Updated 2026-03-08

Quant Tekel vs SFX Funded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?

Traders choosing between Quant Tekel and SFX Funded face a decision between a well-established two-phase program with clear rules versus a single-phase evaluation model. The most significant difference lies in their evaluation structures — Quant Tekel requires a 5% Phase 2 profit target after an 8% Phase 1, while SFX Funded eliminates the second phase entirely. This comparison examines their risk parameters, platform offerings, and practical trading conditions to help you determine which firm aligns with your trading strategy and risk tolerance.

Which Should You Choose?

Quant Tekel suits active traders who need flexibility in their risk management and platform choices. With 4% daily loss limits, 10% total drawdown, and support for MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and FIX API, it accommodates various trading styles despite requiring 4 minimum trading days. The firm's 4.4/5 Trustpilot rating from 12,000 reviews also provides stronger social proof.

SFX Funded works better for conservative traders who prefer simplicity and can operate within tighter risk parameters. The single-phase evaluation removes the complexity of managing a second profit target, and the absence of minimum trading days appeals to swing traders. However, the 3% daily loss and 6% total drawdown limits restrict aggressive strategies.

For most active traders, Quant Tekel offers superior conditions. The additional risk room (4% vs 3% daily, 10% vs 6% total) and multiple platform options outweigh the inconvenience of a two-phase evaluation, especially given the significantly larger review base providing better transparency.

Quant Tekel vs SFX Funded FAQ