TPThe Trading Playbook
ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more

Updated 2026-03-08

Blue Guardian vs SFX Funded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?

Traders choosing between Blue Guardian and SFX Funded face a decision between an established firm with comprehensive platform options versus a newer entrant with limited available information. Blue Guardian stands out with instant payouts, full MT4/MT5 support, and news trading permissions, while SFX Funded's specific trading conditions remain largely undisclosed. This comparison examines the key differences in trading rules, platform access, and payout structures to help you determine which firm aligns with your trading strategy.

BG
Blue Guardian
Est. 2022 · N/A
4.3
1,500 reviews
VS
3 wins
7 ties
1 wins
SF
SFX Funded
Est. 2023 · N/A
4
200 reviews
Feature
Blue Guardian
SFX Funded
Challenge Price ($100K)
$506
N/A
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
N/A
Max Daily Loss
3%
3%
Max Total Loss
6%
6%
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit
No limit
Payout Split
80% (up to 90%)
N/A
Payout Frequency
instant
bi-weeklyFaster payouts
Platforms
MT4, MT5More platform options
N/A
Blue Guardian
Pros
+Instant funding accounts available - skip evaluation phases entirely
+Scale up to $4M in funding capacity
+Instant payouts and 24-hour payout guarantee available
+Multiple account types including 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step challenges
+100% refundable fees after fourth payout
Cons
Relatively new firm established in 2022
Lower leverage ratios compared to some competitors (1:30 max for most instruments)
Limited transparency on company background and headquarters location
Higher fees for larger account sizes compared to some established competitors
SFX Funded
Pros
+Offers up to 100% profit split to traders
+Challenge fees are 100% refundable
+Multiple account size options from $5,000 to $250,000
+Bi-weekly payout frequency
Cons
Limited information available about trading rules and policies
Relatively new firm established in 2023
Lower leverage at 1:30 compared to many competitors
Our Verdict

Which Should You Choose?

Blue Guardian emerges as the clear choice for most traders, particularly those who value platform flexibility and transparent trading conditions. With MT4/MT5 support, news trading permissions, and the ability to scale accounts up to $4 million, Blue Guardian caters to serious traders who need comprehensive tools and clear rules. The firm's 4.3/5 Trustpilot rating from 1,500 reviews also demonstrates a more established track record than SFX Funded's limited review base.

SFX Funded's lack of disclosed information about challenge prices, profit targets, and platform options makes it difficult to recommend for any specific trader type. While both firms offer 3% maximum daily loss limits, Blue Guardian's transparent 10% Phase 1 profit target and 80-90% payout split provide the clarity traders need to make informed decisions. For traders seeking a reliable prop firm with proven conditions and platform support, Blue Guardian offers the better package despite SFX Funded's bi-weekly payout advantage.

Choose Blue Guardian if:
Instant funding accounts available - skip evaluation phases entirely
Scale up to $4M in funding capacity
Instant payouts and 24-hour payout guarantee available
Multiple account types including 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step challenges
Choose SFX Funded if:
Offers up to 100% profit split to traders
Challenge fees are 100% refundable
Multiple account size options from $5,000 to $250,000
Bi-weekly payout frequency
Frequently Asked Questions

Blue Guardian vs SFX Funded FAQ

Related Comparisons
/Compare/Fundednext vs Blue Guardian/Compare/Ftmo vs Blue Guardian/Compare/Fundingpips vs Blue Guardian/Compare/Fundednext vs Sfx Funded/Compare/Ftmo vs Sfx Funded/Compare/Fundingpips vs Sfx Funded
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.