ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
AquaFunded vs FundedX: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between AquaFunded and FundedX face a classic trade-off between cost versus difficulty. AquaFunded charges $283 for a $100K challenge but demands a 10% Phase 1 profit target, while FundedX costs $489 but only requires 5% profits in their single-phase evaluation. The decision hinges on whether you value lower upfront costs and generous risk parameters, or prefer easier profit targets despite higher fees. This comparison examines their challenge structures, risk rules, and payout terms to determine which firm aligns with different trading styles.
A
AquaFunded
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.3
200 reviews
VS
9 wins
2 ties
2 wins
F
FundedX
Est. 2024 · N/A
4
200 reviews
Feature
AquaFunded
FundedX
Challenge Price ($100K)
$283✓ Lower entry cost
$489
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
5%✓ Easier to pass
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%
None (single-phase)✓ Single-phase evaluation
Max Daily Loss
5%✓ More daily loss room
3%
Max Total Loss
10%✓ More drawdown room
4%
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit✓ No time limit
7 days
Payout Split
90% (up to 100%)✓ Higher starting split
80% (up to 100%)
Payout Frequency
bi-weekly
bi-weekly
AquaFunded
Pros
+Instant funding option available to skip evaluation challenges
+Up to 100% profit split with payout on demand
+No time limits on challenges — trade at your own pace
+Reward guarantee with 24-hour payout or $1000 compensation
Cons
−Relatively new firm (founded 2023) with limited track record
−Lower Trustpilot review count compared to established competitors
−Some account sizes show higher daily loss limits (5%) vs 3% standard
−Instant funding requires higher fees than challenge models
FundedX
Pros
+Multiple challenge types including 7-day Turbo with 100% profit split
+Instant funding options available with immediate capital access
+Copy trading allowed in Turbo challenges
+24/7 customer support available
+Large account sizes available up to $10 million
Cons
−Weekend holding not allowed which limits trading flexibility
−No tick scalping or rapid re-entry permitted
−No stacking allowed (limit of 3+ trades)
−Relatively new firm founded in 2024 with limited track record
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
AquaFunded suits experienced traders who prioritize risk management flexibility and cost efficiency. With 5% daily loss limits and 10% total drawdown compared to FundedX's restrictive 3% and 4% respectively, AquaFunded gives traders significantly more room to weather volatility. The $283 entry cost is 73% cheaper than FundedX's $489, making it ideal for traders testing multiple strategies or those on tighter budgets.
FundedX works better for consistent, low-risk traders who prefer easier profit targets over generous risk parameters. The 5% single-phase target versus AquaFunded's 10% + 5% two-phase structure means less pressure to generate returns quickly. However, the tight 3% daily loss limit makes FundedX unsuitable for scalpers, news traders, or anyone trading volatile sessions.
For most traders, AquaFunded offers better value with its lower costs, superior risk management flexibility, and higher profit splits (90% vs 80%). Unless you specifically struggle with profit generation and prefer minimal risk exposure, AquaFunded's combination of affordability and trading freedom makes it the stronger choice.
Choose AquaFunded if:
→Instant funding option available to skip evaluation challenges
→Up to 100% profit split with payout on demand
→No time limits on challenges — trade at your own pace
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.