This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
Alpha Capital Group vs Quant Tekel: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between Alpha Capital Group and Quant Tekel face a decision between radically different approaches to prop firm challenges. Alpha Capital Group offers an almost free entry at $50 for their $100K challenge but demands a steeper 10% profit target, while Quant Tekel charges $340 upfront but requires only an 8% target with more drawdown protection. This comparison examines how their challenge structures, risk parameters, and payout terms affect different trading styles and experience levels.
AC
Alpha Capital Group
Est. 2021 · London, UK
4.7
17,000 reviews
VS
2 wins
7 ties
4 wins
QT
Quant Tekel
Est. 2023 · Cape Town, South Africa
4.4
12,000 reviews
Feature
Alpha Capital Group
Quant Tekel
Challenge Price ($100K)
$50✓ Lower entry cost
$340
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
8%✓ Easier to pass
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%
5%
Max Daily Loss
4%
4%
Max Total Loss
6%
10%✓ More drawdown room
Min Trading Days
None✓ No minimum
4 days
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit
No limit
Payout Split
80%
80% (up to 90%)✓ Higher profit split
Alpha Capital Group
Pros
+Single flat challenge price of $50 for all account sizes from $5K to $200K
+Unlimited trading days with no time limits to complete evaluations
+Zero commission trading with raw spreads
+One-step evaluation process available (AlphaOne)
+Institutional trading environment with sub-70ms execution speeds
Cons
−Lower leverage at 1:30 compared to many competitors
−Limited product information and unclear instrument availability
−Relatively new firm established in 2021
−Maximum account size capped at $200K
Quant Tekel
Pros
+Competitively priced QT Prime challenge from $30 for a $5K account
+Multiple evaluation types — 2-step, instant, and aggressive options to suit different traders
+80% profit split from day one, up to 90% as you scale
+Bi-weekly payouts on QT Prime funded accounts
+Multiple platform options including MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and FIX API
Cons
−News trading restricted on funded accounts — 5-minute buffer required on QT Prime, banned on QT Power and QT Ultra
−Copy trading and multi-account strategies not allowed
−Consistency rules apply across all account types with varying thresholds
−Restricted countries include Russia, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, and Cyprus
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
Alpha Capital Group suits aggressive traders and those testing strategies without major upfront risk, thanks to their $50 entry cost and zero minimum trading days requirement. However, the 10% profit target and tighter 6% total drawdown make it better for experienced traders who can handle steeper targets efficiently.
Quant Tekel works better for conservative traders and beginners who need more room to breathe, offering an easier 8% profit target, 10% total drawdown protection, and scaling up to 90% profit splits. The $340 entry cost is justified by more forgiving risk parameters and better long-term profit sharing.
For most traders starting their prop firm journey, Quant Tekel provides the better path to funded status despite the higher upfront cost, while Alpha Capital Group serves as an excellent low-risk testing ground for experienced traders.
Choose Alpha Capital Group if:
→Single flat challenge price of $50 for all account sizes from $5K to $200K
→Unlimited trading days with no time limits to complete evaluations
→Zero commission trading with raw spreads
→One-step evaluation process available (AlphaOne)
Choose Quant Tekel if:
→Competitively priced QT Prime challenge from $30 for a $5K account
→Multiple evaluation types — 2-step, instant, and aggressive options to suit different traders
→80% profit split from day one, up to 90% as you scale
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.